Fermi Inc. Faces Securities Law Lawsuit After IPO; Investors Urged to Contact DJS Law Group

LOS ANGELES, Jan. 19, 2026 – In a significant legal development affecting shareholders of Fermi Inc. (traded on NASDAQ under the ticker symbol FRMI), the DJS Law Group, LLP has formally reminded investors of a pending class action lawsuit alleging violations of federal securities laws and urging affected shareholders to consider their legal rights and options.

Overview of the Securities Lawsuit

According to the official press release distributed via PR Newswire, the lawsuit against Fermi Inc. asserts that the Company made false, misleading, or incomplete statements during a crucial period beginning with its initial public offering (IPO) and continuing through December 11, 2025.

This class action filing alleges that these statements violated federal securities laws that are designed to protect investors by requiring transparency and accuracy in the disclosure of material information to the market. Shareholders who purchased FRMI shares during the class period are being encouraged to contact DJS Law Group to explore possible involvement in the case.

Class Period Defined

The legal complaint specifies the “class period” as including shares of Fermi Inc. purchased (a) pursuant and/or traceable to its October 2025 IPO, and/or (b) between October 1, 2025 and December 11, 2025, inclusive. This means that investors who acquired FRMI stock at any time in these windows may be eligible to participate in the lawsuit.

The deadline for potential lead plaintiffs to step forward is March 6, 2026. However, it’s important to note that appointment as lead plaintiff is not mandatory in order for eligible shareholders to recover any potential compensation that may result from the litigation.

Allegations Made in the Complaint

At the core of this class action are allegations that Fermi Inc. made material misrepresentations, or omitted key facts, about its business operations — particularly in connection with a major real estate and technology initiative called “Project Matador.”

Project Matador and Transparency Issues

Project Matador refers to an advanced campus development geared toward expanding Fermi’s technology and energy infrastructure. The lawsuit alleges that the company’s public communications understated the risks tied to Project Matador’s success, specifically by not disclosing the extent of its reliance on a single large tenant for funding.

The complaint claims that several statements issued to investors during the IPO and following months presented a more optimistic picture than the company was legally justified in doing, given the financial realities associated with a key funding source.

Under the securities laws, statements that are materially misleading — meaning they would likely influence a reasonable investor’s decision to buy or sell a security — can serve as the basis for civil liability if the investor suffers financial losses as a result.

Legal Rights for Shareholders

The press release from DJS Law Group makes clear that shareholders who believe they suffered investment losses due to these alleged misrepresentations have the right to consult with legal counsel to determine whether they may participate in the class action or potentially pursue additional legal remedies.

Participation Without Lead Plaintiff Status

Investors should understand that joining the action does not require being designated as the lead plaintiff. Instead, many shareholders participate by remaining class members who may share in any financial recovery that the lawsuit ultimately yields.

About the DJS Law Group

The DJS Law Group is a legal firm specializing in securities class actions, corporate governance disputes, and appraisal rights litigation. In filings involving large public companies, the firm often represents institutional and individual investors who seek accountability for financial losses tied to alleged violations of federal securities statutes.

The firm emphasizes its commitment to balancing robust legal advocacy with thoughtful counseling, aiming to help clients pursue compensation when corporate misconduct or misstatements are alleged.

Contact Information for Legal Counsel

Investors interested in seeking more information, assessing eligibility, or discussing possible involvement in the litigation are encouraged to contact the DJS Law Group directly. The firm’s contact details listed in the press release include:

• David J. Schwartz
• DJS Law Group
• 274 White Plains Road, Suite 1, Eastchester, NY 10709
• Phone: 914-206-9742
• Email: [email protected]

This contact information enables potentially affected shareholders to seek tailored legal guidance about their rights based on individual investment histories and losses.

Financial and Market Context

The timing of this class action comes amid increased scrutiny of Fermi Inc.’s business practices and disclosures since its October 2025 IPO. Other plaintiff firms, including Levi & Korsinsky and the Schall Law Firm, have also been reported to notify investors of separate, similar legal actions related to Fermi’s public statements during this period.

Market observers have noted that some investors experienced sharp stock price declines following disclosures that Project Matador’s funding situation became uncertain in late 2025, triggering broader concerns about the company’s financial health.

Impact on Investors

Investors who bought FRMI shares at higher prices during or shortly after the IPO and sold them after share price declines related to these developments may have experienced significant financial losses. These losses, according to the class action complaint, form the basis for potential claims under securities laws.

The lawsuit’s goal is to seek compensation for eligible shareholders whose investment performance was negatively affected by what the plaintiffs allege were misleading disclosures — a standard legal theory in many securities class actions.

Understanding Securities Law Protections

Federal securities laws in the United States — particularly provisions enforced by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) — require that public companies provide accurate and complete information so that investors can make informed decisions.

When companies fail to comply with these disclosure obligations, affected investors may have legal grounds to pursue recovery through class action lawsuits like the one involving Fermi Inc. These cases often focus on whether the company’s statements were materially misleading and whether investors relied on those statements when deciding to buy or sell securities.

Legal outcomes in such cases can vary widely, including negotiated settlements or court-determined judgments. Shareholder participation rates and applicable deadlines — such as the March 6, 2026 deadline in this case — play a role in shaping how the litigation unfolds.

Next Steps for Investors

Investors who believe they fall within the defined class period and wish to discuss their rights can take several steps:

• Review individual transaction records to verify dates and purchase prices for FRMI shares.
• Contact legal counsel at the DJS Law Group or another qualified securities attorney to assess eligibility and options.
• Submit a claim before the March 6, 2026, lead plaintiff deadline if seeking a leadership role in the lawsuit.
• Monitor official court filings and notices for developments in the class action process.

While no outcome is guaranteed, informed legal consultation can help clarify potential paths toward recovery for eligible investors.

#FermiInc #SecuritiesLawsuit #FRMI #InvestorRights #SlimScan #GrowthStocks #CANSLIM